Archive

Showing posts with label no.1 hit. Show all posts
Showing posts with label no.1 hit. Show all posts

9/24/20

Rounds 4 and 5 Wrap Up: "On the 1's" and "On the 2's"

My strategy for analyzing no.1 hits on the Billboard Hot 100 has been to take glimpses of the songs, one decade at a time.  Using the first week of August as my target date, I started the whole thing off in August of 1958 with the inaugural no.1 hit "Poor Little Fool" by Ricky Nelson.  From there, I visited 1968, 78, so and so forth.  

The last 12 analyses have covered 1961 - 2012.  After analyzing chords, melody and lyrics, I compiled a list of common musical threads that were present in each.  Though I have done for each analyses, I started a fresh list and built on it with each song.  The "final" list ended up with 7 reoccurring musical elements:

Repetitive Melodic Motifs - the overall melody repeats itself both with identical phrases and with similar intervalic or rhythmic motion

Stepwise Motion Common in Melody - 2nds, major or minor, are the primary melodic interval

Hook Uses Song Title - The hook, or catchiest part of the song, utilizes the title

Vocal Harmony - Prevalent vocal arranging through parallel harmony, countermelody and/or call and response

Texture Changes - Timbre and/or dynamic change through instrumental arrangement

Strong Harmonic Motion from V-I - Chord progression that sees V7 resolving to I (or i)

New Material at the End - the closing section of the song features a new melody and/or chord progression

Below, I have summarized each song in relation to these commonalities.  Please take a look at individual entries for each songs analyzed, by the decades: "On the 1's" (1961 - 2011) and "On the 2's" (2012 - 1962). 

Common Threads - 1961 - 2012


A few things stick out.....

Every song contains repeated melodic motifs.  Repetition took a couple of different forms from the use of similar intervals and rhythms to straight out repeats of phrases.  Either way, this is the common thread that makes the most sense, as listeners generally gravitate to predictability.  

Every song on this list includes the title of the song in the hook.  It's interesting that this trend, certainly seen in many modern songs, has been happening since the early 60's.  I know there are exceptions to the rule, but they are few and far between....(notable exception: Drake's 2018 no.1 "In My Feelings")

Prominent stepwise motion was present in almost every song.  While there were 2nds in the melody, Bobby Lewis's 1961 contribution, "Tossin' and Turnin'," leaped around quite a bit.  It makes sense that stepwise melodies are favored by many listeners.  It's also worth mentioning that most of the time, melodies are diatonic.  I may keep closer tabs on this moving forward.  

Texture changes were present on almost every song as well.  The two songs that had static texture from beginning to end were Madonna's "This Used To Be My Playground" (1992) and Nelly's "Hot In Herre" (2012).  Both of those stayed in the same sonic space, dominated by keyboard sounds with no relent.  The other compositions have some change in texture from less drums, to more drums, to no drums.  The same goes for other instruments, like guitars, bass, horns, etc.  There are further exponential variables when you consider way instruments can be grouped to get different timbres and sonic textures.

Many songs use vocal harmony, which coincidentally can be used to change the texture.  The only song above that did have vocal harmony without texture change was Madonna.  This is mostly due to the harmony being present a majority of the time, so nothing ever really feels different.  She provides the harmony herself, keeping the timbre even more unified.

After analyzing this data, I see the "new material at the end" element was really just a reaction to three songs in a row (2011, 2001, 1991).  As you can see, it doesn't occur again outside of 1992, which barely qualified with a 4 measure variation on previous themes.  

A curious element is harmonic motion from V-I.  7 out of 8 songs between 1961 and 1992 contained V-I motion.  The only one that didn't was "Eye of The Tiger," mostly due to the popular minor key progression of i - bVI - bVII....no V's are really needed.  Songs between 2001 and 2012 come up empty though, indicating an abandonment of this traditional cadence.  In keeping with that theme:

Look at those chord counts!  With the exception of "Eye Of The Tiger," the curve is generally higher before the 2000's.  After that, no.1 hits seem to utilize less chords.  This can also be seen in the lack of V-I resolutions.    Check out the line graph below to see how the number of chords used in these no.1 hits has changed through the years.




Let's take a look at some compiled data regarding singer gender, key signatures, tempo, song length, chord progressions and sections. 



Combining the above data with the previous data taken from the round 3 wrap up, in 37 analyses, we see the following trends:
  • 14/37 (38%) in a minor key (+2%)
  • 12/37 (32%) have a tonal center of Ab (G#) or C
  • 16/37 (43%) utilize one primary chord progression for the entire tune (-5%)
  • 26/37 (70%) contain more than 2 sections (+2%)
  • 7/37 (19%) have verse and chorus only (-5%) 
  • 23/37 (62%) contain at least one bridge section (+10%)
  • 14/37 (38%) utilize the bVII chord (-2%)
  • 25/37 (68%) utilize the IV(iv) and I(i) chords (-4%)
  • 34/37 (92%) are in duple (2/2 or 4/4) meter (+/- 0%)
  • 23/37 (62%) feature a male lead singer (+6%)
  • 35/37 (95%) use the title of the song in the hook (+3%)
  • Average length - 4:03.  

Looking at these points, I am thinking of a few things:

  • Major keys are slightly more favored than minor keys.
  • Tonal centers are all over the map with 12/37 songs using C or Ab as the home pitch!?
  • Songs generally have more than 2 sections, which usually includes a bridge.....if there is a bridge, that usually indicates a verse and chorus as well.  
  • Duple meter is king.
  • I and IV (i and iv) chords are common in chord progressions
  • Slightly more male than female lead singers
  • Using the title in the hook is almost universal

So that's a wrap on these two rounds of analyses.  Once again, I am finding myself discovering some cool new songs and appreciating ones I may not have given a chance.  

In the past few weeks, I have been listening to lots of pop radio, mostly to occupy my children (ages 10 and 8) on car rides.  They are very familiar with many top 40 songs and actively sing along.   When I have had enough of a particular song, I zone out.  As the music fades to background music, it's not offensive and doesn't demand my attention, it's just pleasantly there.  Those are the two extremes that contribute to mass appeal.  I can be actively engaged in listening or just find comfort in the familiar well-mixed drone.

Up next time, I'm going to take stop in 2020 and analyze "Circles" by Post Malone. I recently learned it for a gig and figured I should write it up for posterity.  After that, we'll head resume with "On the 3's," heading to 2013.  Get ready for a continued dive into no.1 hits, through the decades.



8/15/20

"Party Rock Anthem" - LMFAO featuring Lauren Bennett and GoonRock, 2011

 LMFAO provided the song of the summer in 2011 with their smash hit "Party Rock Anthem."  The group, an uncle and nephew duo comprised of RedFoo and SkyBlu worked as LMFAO for 6 years (which, yes, stands for "laughing my freaking ass off" [1]) and then called it quits, presumably taking the money and running. [2]  

"Party Rock Anthem" certainly sounds like a fun loving summer time jam and at it's core, is a catchy electronic dance number.  While this song is not the most musically satisfying song to cross the Decade Hit Analysis Project, it does contain several elements I would expect to see in a no.1 hit song.  

July 16 - August 20, 2011: "Party Rock Anthem" by LMFAO featuring Lauren Bennett and GoonRock cements itself as the song of the summer with a 6 week run at no.1.

The form of "Party Rock Anthem" is standard fare with a set of verse/chorus before the bride.  There is an instrumental post chorus (PC) that adds 2 measures the second time around.  The final chorus is half the length of the first two versions. 

The song ends with a lengthy outro that blends elements of the bridge and post chorus sections with a new melody.  27 measures is a strange length, which broken down, works out to be a 10 measure phrase followed by 16 measures of grooving and one final measure of reverberated noise.  

In typical electronic dance music fashion, most of the song is computer generated and the drum part goes where you'd expect it to.  The into features the drums progressively getting more complicated at the synth part bleeds in:

Intro Drum Evolution

The drums come and go over the course of the tune, providing space for vocal breaks and kicking into high gear to keep the dance party rolling.....


Chord Progressions

"Party Rock Anthem" is in the key of F minor and only utilizes three chords.  Part of the intro, the post chorus and part of the outro drone the F minor with a lot of synth bells and whistles, or whirrs and swirls as it may be.  When other chords are in the mix, they follow suit with the progression set up by the primary keyboard riff in the intro:

In the key, this progression works out to:

Fmin7   /  Eb    Db

i          /  bVII  bVI

As seen many times before ("Love the Way You Lie," "Rain On Me," "Magic" to name a few) these chords are staples in a minor key.


Melody

The chorus contains the most melodic substance in the song which is presented after 16 measures of intro.  This catchy hook, which features three part vocal harmony, is the main selling point of the song: (melody written an octave higher)

chorus

In the first measure, eighth notes begin on beat 2 with a C, the 5th of F minor and then leap down to Eb, the minor 7th of the chord.  In the next measure, the melody follows the chord roots, Eb and Db, with added octave harmonies as well as Ab and F, 4th/3rd of the chords, or min3rd/root of F minor.  

In the third measure, we hear an Ab major lick, Ab-Bb-C-Bb, before jumping back down to Eb.  In measure 4, we get something similar to measure 2, this time with 5ths Bb and Ab over Eb and Db chords accompanied by octave harmonies plus F and Eb, 9th/7th of the changes, or Root/min7 of F minor.

These 4 measures are repeated in measures 5 -8.  The entire part is then repeated, save the last 2 measures.  There, we see the Ab major lick extended followed by lots of space.  Silence is broken by "shake that," leading into the post chorus melody.

The post chorus, an instrumental dance break, is led by an analog synthy lead:

Post chorus

The high notes are performed as octave F's, but to my ear, they have this pitchless quality to them (this is probably because I'm a bass player and my listening accuracy diminishes as he pitch gets higher?).  This part is funky and includes some 8th/16th syncopation.  Following a pattern set up in the chorus, the melody follows the root of the chord.

Both of the verses are rapped, starting off with SkyBlu in verse 1.  The flow starts off very disciplined with entrances on (1)+, similar syncopation and a vocable on (4)+ of the second measure.  This pattern begins to deteriorate in measures 5-8, leading into the very different back half of the verse, provided by RedFoo:


verse 1

RedFoo's flow is a stark contrast to SkyBlu and he takes his time and stays just behind the beat.  He trades 8th and 16th syncopation for 8th and quarter syncopation to further the contrast.  

After this verse, we get another chorus which ends with a tag we will hear later.  In F minor, this reestablishes the tonality after the silence and leads nicely into the post chorus synth.

Post Chorus 2 tag


Verse 2, sang by RedFoo, picks up the pace with a faster flow.  The rhythm is not as disciplined as verse 1, but there is use of the silence theme established in the chorus, interrupted with "hating is bad."

verse 2

The last 4 measures of the verse feature some singing.  Here, a two note motive of Eb and F provide the call with the response in a spoken tone.  The calls and responses are melodically uniform, except the final response, which is slower, in RedFoo fashion.

The two note motive set up in this verse foreshadow the bridge melody, provided by English singer Lauren Bennett (G.R.L. and Paradiso Girls):

Bridge - source material

These two measures represent the source material for the bridge and outro.  Each measure is eventually chopped up and repeated in small fragments.  

The outro features one more melodic contribution, that like the bridge, gets chopped up and reused throughout the section:


This line, occurring on the 2nd and 4th measures of the progression, is built on 3 notes, Db, C and Bb.  These pitches cover different chord tones than we have heard throughout the tune: min7th, maj7, 6th and 5th, moving through the three chords.  These new intervals give the ending a very different feel, yet feel familiar when combined with post chorus keyboard, spoken and bridge elements.  


Musical Sticking Points   

This song pulls a whole lot out of three chords.  There are three levels to the chord progression.  1.  The full blast syncopated synth line moving through the changes;  2. The more subtle synth line moving through the changes, generally behind the verse and in the bridge/outro;  3. The single chord pulsing over the post chorus synth line.

The tune also utilizes rests effectively.  As a dance tune, we get pounded with synths and drum patterns at a fast tempo.  When everything stops for 2 or more beats, it results in a cool effect.  Whenever the silence is interrupted, we are given some spoken line, which is easy to sing along with.  

The chorus is very catchy in both lyrics and melody.  The repetitive nature of the melody makes it easy to sing along with and the three part harmony doesn't hurt when non-singers try to keep up.  The small motives are also easy to sing along with.  The 2 note bridge motive and the 3 note outro motive are easy enough on the ears that they get stuck.  The constant repetition makes sure they stay stuck.

The drums are what I think of as typical dance drums.  I'm not up on the lingo of electronica, but I would assume the words "house" or "electro pop" may be appropriate?  The big build in the bridge is a stereotypical part for the genre. Quarter note snare hits for two measures building to eighth notes and climaxing with 16th notes create a huge build.  I am very curious to find the first song that employed this.  I assume it's before 2011, but I'll keep a mental note of its presence here, just in case.


Lyrics

I would argue that lyrics don't matter too much for a dance tune.  If the primary objective is to move to the beat, it doesn't really matter what the words are saying.  This is not a social justice song or an emotional testimony.  LMFAO just wants to you get down....which is a good idea, because these lyrics are terrible.  

The chorus is innocent enough, inviting listeners to have a good time with "Party Rock," LMFAO's album titles ("Party Rock" (2008) and "Sorry for Party Rocking" (2011)).  When the raps come in, things get grim.  Here's a few gems:

Looking for your girl? She on my jock   

Yo! I'm running through these hoes like Drano 

On the rise to the top, no Led in our Zeppelin

Now you wanna be (You're naked now!)

Oh the party lifestyle.  I think they are closer to Led Zeppelin that they think...at least in terms of extra curriculars?


Common Threads

What musical elements are present in no.1 hit songs across the decades?  That is exactly what I am trying to find out.  For each round, I like to start somewhat fresh and develop a list of present musical elements that I expect to find in other songs.  While influenced by past lists, I will try to approach this one from a neutral starting point.  

  • Repetitive Melody - the chorus repeats itself both rhythmically and melodically, using similar patterns over the course of 4 bars, repeated for 8 and again for 16 measures.
  • Stepwise Motion Common in Melody - aside from the leaps in the chorus melody, the song is basically comprised of stepwise motion.
  • Texture Changes - The drums do not pound us in the face the entire time.  There is silence, break downs and build ups.  The overall timbre changes throughout the song.
  • New Material at the End - this is a holdover quality worth mentioning.  Many no.1 songs include new material to finish out the song.   
  • Hook that Uses Title of the Song - another holdover worth mentioning.  

Chord Count - 3 - It might be fun to keep track of how many chords a song uses.....


Final Takeaways

I don't see myself seeking this song out, ever.  I generally don't like dance music (or dance in a club situation) and I would rather listen to other genres.  That being said, I appreciate this song on a musical level.  It accomplishes its goal in spades and the structure of the catchy melody is worth looking at, if you yourself are trying to write a catchy melody.

As a songwriter, I am always trying to write better songs.  Studying no.1 hits has certainly given me insight into the overall process and there is plenty to learn from "Party Rock Anthem."  LMFAO got it right with a simple melody that was enhanced by changing textures and extremes (silence vs dance beat).  They found a formula that worked and 9 years later, this song still holds up, in common musical elements anyway.  *LMFAO are no strangers to quality music....their father and grandfather is Berry Gordy, founder of Motown Records!  

What do you think of "Party Rock Anthem?"  Do the musical qualities shine behind the sparkling mirrorball, or are you lost in the dance party?  Leave me a comment! 

Up next time, continuing with no.1 hits "on the 1's": August 4th - 11th, "Bootylicious" by Destiny's Child goes two weeks at no.1 amidst a sea of R&B titans (Usher, Alicia Keys, J-Lo, Nelly and Mariah Carey).  Let's see if BeyoncĂ© and company contribute musical qualities found in other no.1 hits through the decades.  

[1]https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/lmfao-trademark-application-310996

[2]https://www.billboard.com/articles/news/474982/lmfao-taking-hiatus-says-redfoo

8/11/20

"cardigan" - Taylor Swift, 2020

 Taylor Swift released her 8th studio album in the July 24th, 2020.  The lead single, "cardigan," debuts on the Hot 100 at no.1, August 8th, 2020.  

The track was co-written and produced by Aaron Dessner, of the National, and is not what I would expect from the pop singer, though I am hardly the person to make T-Swift recommendations.  Her new album, Folklore, seems fantastic and well regarded by many.  After reading this Insider.com track by track review, my interest is peaked! [1]  After transcribing most of the lead single though, I'm afraid I won't be as jazzed as those authors.  

There are elements of this song that I do like and there are clear similarities between "cardigan" and other no.1 songs through the decades.  In the end though, the song is just there.  The no.1 status makes me think that the curiosity factor of a surprise Taylor Swift song helped it rocket to the top.  If it manages to stay another week, I will be surprised and impressed.  This Slate.com article eventually agrees with me and hypothesis why the song reached no.1. [2]  Never the less, I will try and set opinions aside and focus on the musical attributes of the song.

August 8th, 2020: "cardigan" by Taylor Swift debuts at no.1 on the Billboard Hot 100.  


There are a few surprises in the form.  The intro features a wind noise and a faint shaker evolving into a neat hand drum/body percussion sample.  Then, all of a sudden, the piano chimes in with verse 1.  This "intro" is a total of ten 8th note beats, equal to 1.25 measures.  This might be the most challenging part of the song, as the accents in the drum sample don't quite indicate where beat 1 ends up landing.  

We then go through a verse/chorus/refrain sequence.  The first statements of the chorus and refrain work together and are only separated at the very end, justifying different labels.  The third chorus, though, ditches the refrain and gets an extra 4 measures, which are different from the first 4.  Each chorus also features different lyrics, furthering the overall story of the song.    

The "refrain," in this case, houses the title phrase and is repeated 3 times in total.  The closing statement gets a cool treatment with alternate chords, taken from the bridge.  

Speaking of bridges, there are two of them.  The first begins with 4 measures of an instrumental followed by 4 measures of melody built over new chord changes.  The 2nd bridge uses recycled chord changes and features a brand new melody, making it more than a third verse.

There is lots of added production to the entire track ranging from noises, to string samples to a Mellotron part.  All of these sounds, combined with the slow tempo certainly create an tangible mood.    

Chord Progression


Before looking at any notation, the song utilizes swing 16th notes.  This swing feel only occurs with groups of two sixteenth notes and not with two 8th notes.  If you feel the micro beat (8th notes), it has the same effect as swung eighth notes.  

"cardigan's" opening chord progression is set up by the piano in the first verse:

Piano - Opening

In the key of Eb, this plays out to be:

Fmin   /   Bb  /  Ab   /  Bb

ii       /   V     /  IV    / V

The chorus delivers the I chord and a familiar chord sequence:

Eb  /  Bb  / Ab  /  Bb

I   /  V    / IV   / V

The refrain uses the verse changes, above.

The first bridge features a different chord progression, which is also used over the final refrain:

Ab  /  Cmin  /  Bb   /  Ab

IV  / vi        / V     / IV

There is a very slight variation used during the second half of the third chorus, which carries over to the second bridge.  There, we see the first Bb chord get an F in the bass.  This slight shift gives that chord a much different feel when following the Eb.

Melody

The verses share a similar melody, built on two syncopated figures, sang low in T-Swift's range:

Verse 1
Measures 1,2, 5 and 6 use a motif built around note groupings Ab, G, Bb and Bb, C and F.  Each chunk fits into the 16th-8th-16th syncopation beginning on beat 2.  

Measures 3,4, 7 and 8 use a triplet theme, which will reoccur throughout the song.  Repeated three note groupings of G, F and Eb (3-2-1 in Eb) are borrowed from the piano riff that floats above each section.

The first verse leads directly into the chorus, carrying over both rhythmic entrances and syncopation.  The chorus leans on repeated 16th notes, a staple in Swift's melodic arsenal.  Each of the two phrases ends with a melisma on Eb-G-F-Eb, the same pitches used in the piano line and the verse triplet figure.

Chorus 1 and Refrain
   

After 4 bars of chorus, the chords shift back to the verse progression for the refrain.  Here, once again , the triplet rhythm is used, this time descending through the Eb pentatonic scale.  The word "cardigan" uses a brand new rhythmic figure and is followed by familiar syncopation.  At the tail end of the refrain, we hear a guitar riff which will also reappear throughout the tune and is repeated in verse 2.

Basic Guitar Riff
 

Verse 2, chorus 2 and the 2nd refrain rehash melodic material from previous iterations.  After the second refrain, we head into the first bridge with 4 measures of instrumental plodding.  The piano riff retains its rhythmic placement but shifts notes to support the impending C minor chord (C, Eb, F, G, C).  When Taylor comes in, we hear:

Bridge 1 - meas. 5-8

Rhythmic entrances shift to beat 4, instead of beat 2 and the dotted eighth-sixteenth figure is used repeatedly.  The first half uses C and G, which resolve down to Eb on the C minor (minor 3rd).  The second half shifts those notes down a whole step to Bb and F, retaining the ending descending line.

At this point in the song, we have heard each primary section twice, gotten a brief instrumental interruption and new melody with the bridge.  Now, we head into the back half, which picks up the pace.  Out of bridge 1 comes the third chorus, an 8 measure variation on the original 4 bar melody:

Chorus 3

The first 4 bars are like the previous choruses with different lyrics and a harmony added up a third.  The last 4 measures start like the chorus proper, but veer off course in measure 6, going lower over the new chord, Bb/F.  The last two measures borrow the triplet line from the verse and refrain, only with a new note grouping: Eb, C and Bb.  

These last 4 measures create a very subtle shift to the natural minor sound and blend melodic and rhythmic themes used previously.  The 8th measure of this chorus (above) is the pickup to the second bridge, a mammoth 12 measure section that expands upon rhythms and melodies presented in the first bridge:

Bridge 2 - meas. 1-6

The entrances in this bridge are similar to the last bridge; 8th-16th syncopation on beat 4.  Each entrance is followed by descending 16th notes, Ab, G, F, Eb, and lead directly into an additional statement of the phrase.  Bb and F become melodic focal points in between and the chord progression shifts to include more Bb/F chords. 

Bridge 2 -  meas.7-12

After 8 measures, the chord progression shifts back to verse changes and the pacing slows down.  We get 4 repeats of "you'd come back to me," which feel spacious after all the repeated 16th notes.  The piano strays from its original feel and the guitar riff weaves in and out.  

A returning piano riff sets up the final refrain, this time utilizing the bridge changes.  The guitar riff ends the song, repeating the last two notes, played over an Ab chord.  There is an "outro" consisting of a faded 3 measure chunk of NIN-esque noise.  

Guitar - final melodic statement
  

Musical Sticking Points

There is certainly an evolution of musical ideas throughout the song.  While this is most obviously driven by changing lyrics, the chord progressions sneak in and out.  The song is built on, essentially, 5 chords: Fmin, Bb, Ab, Eb and C minor.  While the chord progressions vary in chord order, intensity and inversion, they do end up settling into the same harmonic feel.

The melody is crafted well, constantly borrowing rhythms and motifs from itself.  The third chorus has a nice mix of several parts and the second bridge logically develops a melody seen earlier in the tune.  All of these moments are great, but there is a lot of repetition before we see any development.  

The drum part is unique for a pop song.  The opening groove is very sparse and sounds like clapping and patting on someone's legs.  Eventually, we hear the familiar kick and snare, but they don't play a standard beat.  Below is an approximation of the opening/first verse drums feel compared with the chorus feel:

Drum approximations - Verse 1 vs Chorus 1

Both versions play off of the swing 16th feel and syncopation present in the vocal melodies.  

The overall arrangement is pretty slick.  On my first few listens, I had trouble distinguishing the parts.  This was due, in part, to ever changing lyrics, but also due to borrowed themes.  When I wrapped my head around what was actually happening, I could see the quality craftsmanship.  Unfortunately, this is not overwhelmingly positive.  The dreamy atmosphere can work against itself and create this gray blob of sound that all feels the same.


Lyrics

Taylor Swift is a master at painting vivid portraits with words.  She writes these lyrics from the perspective of "Betty," a character featured on the album "Folklore."  There is a lot to unpack in these lyrics, and I recommend taking a peek at the Lyric Genius annotations. [3]

The verse uses the rhyme scheme AAB CCB, with B being a refrain, of sorts, "when you are young they assume you know nothing."  The chorus reverses this pattern with ABB ACC, this time with A as a refrain of "I knew you."  

Bridge 1 is comprised of internal rhymes resulting in (AA)B (AA)B.  The second bridge moves through 4 sets of rhyming and/or near rhyming couplets ("long" and "young"; "expired" and "light").

The refrain also uses a near rhyme with "cardigan" and "bed."

Overall, the lyrics are well crafted and contain some cool imagery and lots of "Easter Eggs," which Taylor has become known for.  


Common Threads

This has been an epic round "on the 0's" with data points from 1960, 1970, 1980, 1990, 2000, two songs from 2010 and now, four songs from 2020.  For each song, I have compiled a list of common musical elements present and then see where the analysis in question figures in.  Adding "cardigan" into the mix, we see:

  • Repeated melodic motifs - this song expertly reuses themes in each section.  This song is right up there with "Rain On Me" in the way melodic motifs are recycled and repackaged.  
  • Strong harmonic motion from V to I  -While there is a strong pull to V, it doesn't actually function like V.  The pull from IV to I is noticeable.  
  • Background singers contribute to melodic/harmonic texture - I'm not ready to cross this one out due to the presence of the vocal harmonies from the first bridge through the end of the tune.  They are not, however, such and important contributing force to the melody or the overall textural presentation.  The instrumental arrangement is far integral in that picture.
  • Modulation -  
  • New material presented at the end - technically, there is not new material at the end.  There is however, is different twist on something we already heard: the refrain lyrics and melody combined with the bridge chord progression.
  • Hook that uses the title of the song   - I'm not even sure what the hook is, or if there is a hook.  I chose "you put me on and said I was your favorite" because it was the one part I could easily sing along with, it stayed lyrically consistent and featured a melody used elsewhere in the song.  Any way you slice, it doesn't use "cardigan" in the most singable part of the melody.  
  • Contains a lyrical refrain  This could get triple points, as there are several lyrical refrains: "when you are young they assume you know nothing," "I knew you," and "when I felt like I was an old cardigan...."   
  • Evolution of musical elements -  The melodic development and ending chord rearrangement qualify this for sure.
A solid 3/8 common threads and 2 near hits for "cardigan."  The end of round wrap up will hopefully flush out some of these elements and see what musical trends have been seen in no.1 hits through the decades.

Final Takeaways

After this entire analysis, I'm still not sure where I land on "cardigan."  On paper, I love it.  I think the way the melody and chord changes seamlessly move between and play off one another is genius.  The lyrics are rich with description and references to provoke the imagination of any listener.  The whole song has a vibe that can't be denied and I found this song affecting my mood.

Listening to it, though, is not as fun as talking about it.  It's so slow and all of the similar melodies blend together, resulting in forgettable melodies.  The hook in this song is hard to pin down, which for a pop tune, is a very surprising.  

All of that being said, I would be happy to hear or play an acoustic rendition of the tune.  I actually started thinking about how this song would translate with just chords and melody.  Well, Taylor must have thought that too, because there is a lovely acoustic version.  When the production is taken away, you can hear the song for what it is, a lovely ballad.  All of this is fine, it's just not what I would expect from a no.1 hit song, even if it has some great musical elements at work.

I will be very curious to see if this song lasts another week at no.1 or if its popularity is largely due to the curiosity factor.  2020 has seen a lot of 1 week reigns at no.1, which I'm willing to bet has happened before, through the decades.  Perhaps I should take comfort in the adventurous taste of music consumers.  Taylor did not have to rap about her wealth or romantic prowess to make it to no.1  Instead, she wrote a beautiful song that people want to hear.  

What do you think of "cardigan?"  Am I missing something, or is kind of boring?  If you read this before August 15th, 2020, do you think it will make another week at no.1?  Leave me a comment!

Up next time, the "on the 0's" recap round, where I will look at all the songs analyzed and see if there is any definitive common ground between musical elements.     



[1]https://www.insider.com/taylor-swift-folklore-review-tracklist-breakdown-2020-7

[2]https://slate.com/culture/2020/08/taylor-swift-folklore-sales-cardigan-billboard-hot-100.html

[3]https://genius.com/20429809

8/7/20

"Savage" - Megan Thee Stallion Featuring Beyoncé, 2020

 I am hoping this entry will unlock some of the mysteries that have me perplexed regarding how a song becomes no.1 on the Billboard Hot 100 chart.  "Savage" is first released by Megan Thee Stallion in March, 2020.  The song becomes popular, largely spurred by a Tik Tok dance and accompanying video by Stallion herself, but doesn't chart very high on the hot 100.  

Somewhere along the lines, BeyoncĂ© hears the track and decides to do a remix.  She takes the base track and gives the tune a major overhaul, essentially turning out a completely different song.  The end result is a record setting no.1 hit for both ladies. [1] 

Herein lies the mystery.  In my opinion, "Savage" is the epitome of bad pop music, banking on a simple backing track, limited melodies and cringe-worthy lyrics that play exclusively to pop culture's lack of sophistication and dignity.  It is, however, damn catchy.  Even after hearing the original Megan Thee Stallion version, and being very unimpressed, I came away with the hook stuck in my head.....a hook that is devoid of melody.  What is going on in this song then?  Why is it so popular?  Hopefully this analysis can shed some light on that mystery.

May 30th, 2020: "Savage" by Megan Thee Stallion, featuring Beyoncé, hits no.1 for one week!


After analyzing several songs from 2020, a clear trend in simple forms is seen.  This one goes verse-chorus, verse-chorus, bridge, verse-chorus.  There is a nice wrinkle in BeyoncĂ©'s verses, 12 measures versus Megan Thee Stallion's 8 measures.  

The 4.5 measure intro looks strange, but the .5 accounts for a 2 beat pickup that leads to BeyoncĂ©'s opening lines.  

The bridge feels like a verse, featuring vocalizations from both singers that are similar to their previous contributions.  The structure sets it apart.  It begins with 4 measure of MTS rapping, which leads into melodic singing from BeyoncĂ©.  After 4 measures, MTS takes the reigns again before we get a final verse from Queen B.  

There is a natural evolution embedded in the form.  MTS primarily handles the first verse and chorus.  BeyoncĂ© takes verse two and contributes a little more on the second chorus.  The bridge is double booked and Bey gets the third verse.  The final chorus is also a double feature.  This form is a good example of evolution of a song, or hearing the same thing without hearing the same thing.


Chord Progressions

The entire song is based on two alternating chords:

Base Chord Progression


These two chord are played on a keyboard sounding synth in very close voicing.  The ninth on top with the minor 7th in the mix makes them very dense.  Because of this, they key, and even tonal center, is hard to pin down with certainty.  

Sometimes, the song feels like it's in the key of Ebmin, in which case this progression is: i bii

From a melodic standpoint, it aligns closer with Bb minor, moving the progression to: iv bv

The relative major of Eb minor is Gb major, moving the progression to: vi bvii

The relative major of Bb minor is Db major, moving this progression to: ii biii

No matter how you slice it, it's two alternating chords.  We never get any more harmonic clues to cement us firmly in any camp.  I am reminded of Drake's "In My Feelings" (2018) where there were two alternating half steps, but the melody was clearly rooted in a key.  As we will see, the melody of "Savage" strongly indicates Db major and Bb minor triads, with pentatonic lines, hence the key choice of Bb minor.  


Melody

"Savage's" melodic content ranges from spoken rap segments to full on singing and several moments somewhere in between.  BeyoncĂ©'s opening 4 measures foreshadows elements we will here for the remainder of the tune:

She begins with a melodic motif that moves between F and Eb, sitting very low in her range, almost spoken, but undeniably on a pitch.  F against Ebmin9 serves as the 9th and the Eb against the Emin9 is a major 7th, which further adds to the dense dissonance of that chord.  She introduces the bulk of the rhythmic content in the song, strings of 16th note syncopation.   We also get a preview of the background/production elements.  There are some high harmonies appearing intermittently as well as the echoing "okay" and "yeah."  The 4th harmonies here will also carry through most of the tune.

Megan Thee Stallion follows up Bey's intro with the rap laden first verse:


Verse 1 - MTS

Megan's verse contains elements foreshadowed in the intro.  We see many 16th note combinations.  Throughout the verse we get vocal responses reminiscent of the into, as well as some harmonic enhancements to words in the rap.  

The chorus is certainly the focal point of the song and home to the catchy hook "I'm a savage...."  Each time the chorus happens, it is presented differently.  The first time features MTS following up on her rapped verse.  The second and third times feature additional background vocals/noises and responses from BeyoncĂ©.  The third time even features a very low vocal mixed over the spoken rap, reinforcing the natural high/low flow of the spoken part.  The following is a representation of most of the combined elements across the three statements of the chorus:


Chorus - combined elements


 The chorus has much more melodic space than the verses.  The harmonic elements generally occur on "I'm a savage," strengthening the title hook.  We also see the vocal responses grow in frequency and complexity as the chorus moves along.  Noteworthy too, is the overall structure, a repeated 4 bar segment based off a repeated 2 bar phrase.  The chorus is very repetitive and predictable, possibly accounting for mass appeal.  

*Check out the third chorus, which features a building "ooh" from BeyoncĂ©.  She builds a chord with Eb, F and Ab, creating this Ebmin11 (or Fmin / Ebmin) sound that is very compelling.  

After the first chorus, BeyoncĂ© gets the 2nd verse and truly begins to transform the song.  All of the elements foreshadowed in the intro, first verse and chorus are enhanced even further with this 12 measure verse.

Verse 2 - Beyoncé - meas.1-4

The first 4 measures are spoken and develop 16th note rhythmic themes with varying entrances (beat 2 and beat (1)+), eventually getting faster with 32nd note syncopation.  We continue to see harmonized and response background vocals, usually incorporating the parallel 4th sound.  The vocalizations in the opening bars outline a Bb minor/Db major arpeggio.   

The next four measures expand the rhythmic adventure, throwing in 16th/32nd note syncopation.  We also see a return to a theme from the intro, the repeated F and Eb pitches.  In the 4 measures below, the bottom staff represents a new synth element that toggles between Eb and Bb.  There is also a rhythmic vocal in this line, occurring on all the upbeats, that reminds me of something out of the "Lion King" or "Moana."  

Verse 2 - Beyoncé - meas.5-8

The final 4 measures return to mostly straight 16th notes and give a clear key indication in the last two measures.  There, we see a Bb minor pentatonic line, complete with parallel 4th harmonies.  
Verse 2 - Beyoncé - meas. 9-12

BeyoncĂ©'s 3rd verse is along the same lines as this verse and uses many of the same conventions: 16th note rhythmic passages with harmonized words and sang responses.  

The bridge, which is an honorary verse, begins and ends with Megan Thee Stallion.  She comes in rapping hard about her impending credibility, courtesy of Bey.  She also ends the bridge by rapping 4 measures that were included in the original version of "Savage."  Aside from the chorus, this is the only part from the original that makes it into the remix, for better or worse.

In between MTS's bridge work, Beyonce interjects what may be the most interesting part of the song.  It is different enough to warrant calling this section a bridge, and is even labeled as such in the YouTube Video lyric description

Bridge - Beyoncé - meas.5-8

Notably, the entire section is sung on a pitch, separating it from the rapped verses.  The opening melismas are centered around Bb minor pentatonic, getting us closer to a tonal center.  We also hear plenty of harmonized 4ths throughout this short section, so though different, it ties in close to previous material.  

Musical Sticking Points

The musical element that sticks out to me most is the evolution of the track from beginning to end.  It starts sparse with just the piano.  The drums trickle in and eventually add the bass tones.  This eventually falls apart, giving way to another synth or vocal element before returning later on.  The textural landscape of the song is ever changing, despite the static harmonic elements.  

There is some nice complimentary syncopation happening between the primary piano line and the drums and bass.  


developed drums/ base harmonic progression

The drum programming is very deep and there are even claves hiding in there.  At various times, accents stick out in the drum programming, mostly revolving in the higher frequencies and cymbals.  The above accents can be heard in the first chorus on the high hat.  Perhaps it's these slight nuances that keep your attention throughout the song, though I would imagine this is subconscious.  

The melodic content in the song is, generally speaking, not very strong.  Rhythmically, it is very complex, but melodically is touch and go.  I am reminded of "Love the Way You Lie" by Eminem and Rihanna (2010).  In that tune, the choruses had a strong melody while the verses housed the rhythmic rapping.  There was a little something for everyone.  This tune has that, but it's mixed in a little here and there. 

 Consider this analogy: If music was like a Thanksgiving dinner, Rihanna provides the melodic meat and potatoes while Eminem throws in all the favorite side dishes, on a separate plate.  BeyoncĂ© is the meat and potatoes, but they are mixed up with some of the side dishes, and then Megan Thee Stallion throws her side dish right onto the same plate, then they start to mix it all together.  Obviously this is a tasty concoction, but sometimes I just want to enjoy the elements individually, or at least with less confusion.

  

Lyrics

Here's where I really lose it with this song.  I generally get turned off from songs that are braggadocious for the sake of being braggadocious.  The remix lyrics, while offensive in many respects, are actually a step up from the original, which is not intended to be a compliment.  Both versions feature lyrics that hype up the singers to the nth degree of hype.  

When reading these lyrics, I had many questions....what does bougie mean?  What does ratchet mean?  Why is she so proud to be a savage?  Here's what I found

Bougie: Aspiring to be a higher class than one is. Derived from bourgeois

Ratcheta slang term in hip hop that, in its original sense, referred to an uncouth woman, and may be a Louisianan regiolect version of the word "wretched" or a variation of the word "ratshit."

I think the consensus is that while she is classy and aspires to reach beyond her current means, she is, at the core, streetwise.  This article sheds a little light on the situation. [2]  Megan actually says it best in her verse:

Hood, but I'm classy, rich, but I'm ratchet 

BeyoncĂ©'s verse are laced with advertisements.  She references Tik Tok, "demon time" and "Fans Only" in her verse, as well as her own clothing line, Ivy Park.  she also references her famous hips and gives a shout out to her mother, Tina Knowles (sadly not Tina Turner, who I assume is admired by current pop singers for her contributions?)[3]

While I am not a fan of the lyrical content, they are crafted very well.  Internal rhymes are all over the place and perhaps best seen in the chorus:

I'm a savage, classy, bougie, ratchet

Sassy, moody, nasty 

 Common Threads

This round "on the 0's" has more data points than any round to date!  I have analyzed one song from 1960, 1970, 1980, 1990 and 2000; two songs from 2010 and this marks the third song from 2020.  For each of these 10 analyses, I have kept a list of common elements present.  Here is how "Savage" fits into this puzzle.  

  • Repeated melodic motifs 
  • Strong harmonic motion from V to I  -This song could be the least harmonically sensible song analyzed in this project....
  • Background singers contribute to melodic/harmonic texture - the background vocals set the remix far apart from the original.  They are integral to the texture of the song.  
  • Modulation -  
  • New material presented at the end 
  • Hook that uses the title of the song   
  • Contains a lyrical refrain  - "I'm a savage" could be considered a lyrical refrain as it appears in the hook, at the very end of the song and gets callbacks in the verses. 
  • Evolution of musical elements This common thread has been eluding this list and has been an important element present in multiple songs.  

5/8 elements is a good showing for this song, in a musical sense.  In the wrap up (potentially the next entry), these elements will be analyzed and flushed out a little further, trying to uncover musical elements present in no.1 hit songs, regardless of the decade.


Final Takeaways     

This is a tough one.  Part of me really likes this song.  It has attitude, which earns it a point when scoring with my anti-authority side.  The rhythmic hook is easy to reproduce, especially considering you can speak the words and not be bound to any sense of pitch.  The background vocals and harmonies are cool and the 4th sound is very appealing to me, especially against the minor half stepping progression.  

Another part of me can't stand that this song is so popular.  The lyrics are not good and generally offensive, at least when it comes to playing it for my kids.  The music, while appealing to me, is kind of boring after a while.  I generally gravitate towards good changes and this one just doesn't deliver.  

Then there's Tik Tok.  I do not use Tik Tok but have a general knowledge of how it works.  In viewing YouTube videos, I get instantly hot when I see comments that say "only like if you didn't come from Tik Tok."  First off, who cares?  It's music.  Tik Tok is only 15 seconds long, which is not remotely enough time to really make a true assessment of any song.  Secondly, why does it matter if you are familiar from Tik Tok or not?  I don't like to stand on a soapbox about frivolous social fads, but this one leaves me scratching my head.   

What do you think of "Savage?"  Is it possible to like the song for the song, or do you need to do the dance?  How does the original compare to the remix?  Leave me a comment!


Up next time:  If "Rockstar" remains at no.1 for the week of August 8th, 2020, I will compile the data into a round 3 wrap up.  If there is a new song at no.1, I will analyze that and then complete the round 3 wrap up.  Whew, what a round!

   


[1]https://www.wmagazine.com/story/beyonce-megan-thee-stallion-savage-number-one/

[2]https://www.songmeaningsandfacts.com/savage-by-megan-thee-stallion/

7/30/20

"Rain On Me" - Lady Gaga & Ariana Grande, 2020

I am increasingly curious about the music of 2020.  As we are only just halfway through the year, I think it would be prudent to get an entire year of no.1 hits analyzed.  Last time, I checked out "Rockstar" by DaBaby, featuring Roddy Ricch.  What did that song beat out to slide into the no.1 position?

June 6th, 2020 - "Rain On Me" by Lady Gaga &Ariana Grande DEBUTS at no.1 on the Hot 100.  In addition to that impressive stat, Lady Gaga and Ariana G both have slews of other chart topping accolades that are worth looking into. [1]  Unfortunately for Gaga and Grande, they only last one week, a trend throughout the spring of 2020.

The song came into existence after the singers bonded over persevering through loss and heartbreak.  The song is certainly reflective of two strong women proclaiming their power despite negative forces against them. [2]  Impressively, the two share writing credits on the track, along with the several others.   



This one has a logical form:  Verse (A) followed by a pre-chorus (B), then the chorus (C) then a post-chorus (D).  This 1-2-3-4 punch keeps the song feeling varied, despite the (essentially) same chord progression throughout.  

The bridge comes in at the most opportune time, truly bridging the first ABCD statements with the ending, a final statement of the chorus and an outro section, which is an inventive variation on the chorus (hence B').  The song ends as it begins, with Gaga providing the melody.

Stylistically, this is an upbeat dance tune with disco elements.  There are layers upon layers of synth accompanied by drum programming you would expect for the genre.  The bass pops and slaps some funky lines that help keep one foot in the highly produced dance world and the other in the organic music realm.  


Chord Progressions

The entire song consists of only 4 chords, relying primarily on a 2 chord sequence.  We hear the base progression up front, in the first verse, played by a guitar and synth combo:

Opening - base progression

In the key of C# minor, this plays out to be:

C#min7     Amaj9  / (Amaj9)      /  C#min7   Amaj9  /  (Amaj9)  Badd4
i                  (b)VI  /  (bVI)          /   i             bVI      /   (bVI)       bVII

For the third analysis in a row we see a minor i to bVI progression carrying the song.  Popular progression indeed! 

As the pre-chorus flows out of the verse, we hear additional syncopated synth elements (1st and 3rd measures), as well as a transition chord to get into the chorus: 

Pre-chorus rhythm

The F#min11 chord, or iv, happens quickly, yet offers a different tone color to get back to i.  In examining all the chords, the unifying pitch would be B, as is serves as the minor 7 of C#min, 9th of A and 11th of F#minor.  

The bass comes in on the prechorus, holding down sustained roots.  In the chorus, the bass moves to this syncopated line:


chorus 1 and 2, verse 2 and (last 4 of) bridge bass

When the post-chorus kicks in with all its disco glory, the bass goes full on, adding in octave pops:

post chorus, chorus 3 and outro bass


There are two places with slight variation to this main 4 bar loop.  (1) The ends of the chorus stays on Amaj9 instead of returning to the C#min7 in the second half of the 2nd measure.  (2) The bridge features a harmonic rhythm variation:  two and half measures on C#min7 followed by a measure and a half of Amaj9, which is followed by 4 complete measures of C#min7 before returning to the base 4 bar progression.  (see bridge "Melody").  


Melody

Though the entire song is based on the same chord progression, each section has a unique vocal presentation.  As sections repeat, they feature much melodic variance.  This type of evolution, a hallmark in many no.1 hits, is clearly exemplified throughout "Rain On Me."  You hear the same sections multiple times without ever hearing exactly the same thing.  

Lady Gaga begins the song with the first verse, introducing a melodic motif that starts on repeated B's, beginning on the + of beat 1.  She then descends a 5th to E, followed by a minor 3rd to C#, singing through the C#min7 arpeggio, excluding the 5th.  She ends the phrase by repeating the previous 2 notes and going down one note further to B.  Her second and fourth phrases repeat this, extending the ends to complete the C#min7 arpeggio.  
Verse 1

Compare Gaga's verse to Grande's verse.  Here, we see similar rhythmic entrances, on the + of beat 1.  Ariana chooses different notes, beginning the first and third phrases on G# and working only as low as E, in stepwise motion.  Her second and fourth phrases are more sparse, using only F# with varied endings.     

Verse 2

This evolution of melody also occurs in the pre-choruses.  In the first, Lady Gaga sings solo, laying out in every other measure.  She introduces a new rhythmic theme, answering the synth part established while she rests.  Her melody covers the G#min7 arpeggio and concludes with a definitive return to the C#min7 with the minor 3rd, E.   


PreChorus 1

When this section comes around again, Ariana fills in the previous spaces with similar syncopation.  Her notes cover the C#min7 arpeggio while Gaga sticks with the G#min7 arpeggio, allowing each singer to occupy a slightly different melodic space.  

PreChorus 2

The choruses also follow suit in their melodic evolution.  Lady Gaga sings the first chorus solo, another outline of the C#min7 chord.  Her entrance is higher than her verse, starting on an E before working her way down to B and then back up to E.  Her repeated "rains" constitute the hook.  She ends the choruses with spoken "rain on me."  


Chorus 1

The second and third choruses feature Grande adding close harmony.  Starting off a third lower and getting as close as a 2nd apart, the different timbres keep it consonant and it flows together nicely.  The ending features Ariana interjecting some powerful C#'s (roots) between Gaga's spoken passages.  

Chorus 2

The post chorus creates a lot of space and features repeated "rains," first introduced in the chorus.  This section also includes a funky E major guitar line.  Like the other sections, the post chorus ends up being different the second time around, featuring some diva-esque ad-libing from the ladies. 

Post Chorus 1

The bridge slows things down in the first four measures with affected traded vocals.  We also see the change in harmonic rhythm and pacing.  Then, we get Gaga speaking all her lines with Grande joining in singing, every other bar.  Most of these melodic passages are in the C# minor space, introducing the 9th at the end of the tenth bar.  The section ends with Grande climbing high to the sustained G#.
Bridge

The outro of the song, a new melody, borrows from the chorus.  The first measure, the chorus harmony alone, evolves into a variation on the chorus syncopation.  This part also contains the highest notes in the song, an exuberant "woooooo hoo" provided by Gaga.  Not to be outdone, Grande answers with a melisma on the C# minor pentatonic.  The song ends, fittingly, with Gaga's spoken secondary hook "rain on me."  

Outro

Musical Sticking Points

This entire song is an illustration of musical evolution.  For three minutes, the same four chords are contorted in five different ways.  Not only that, vocal melodies are repeated and varied to get the most out of a small amount of musical information.  

To me, the bridge is the most creative part of the tune.  Here, we see a brand new harmonic rhythm on the same harmony feels completely different.  The first four measures augment the rhythm, stretching things out and delaying the switch to Amaj9.  Then, it stays on C#min7 for four entire measures, the longest stretch on that chord, before switching back to the original progression.  It effectively breaks up the song without adding additional base material.

The production is also second to none.  There are layers of swirling synth parts, percussive elements and sounds that sit way back in the mix to create atmosphere.  The drums are well done, leaving plenty of space and readily changing the texture with their presence (or absence).  

The melodic content is varied just enough.  It changes, but never feels out of place.  The two singers compliment each other well and even flaunt their differences when Gaga speaks in low tones against Grande's lines.  They each have the ability to add nuance and variation in their lines, allowing the same melody to feel different on each repeat.  While neither do anything technically crazy, they play their strengths well.  

Lyrics

As mentioned, this song is about persevering through the heartbreak.  The rain, an analogy for all the bad juju, is taken on bravely.  The pre-chorus says it best:

It's coming down on me
Water like misery
It's coming down on me
I'm ready, rain on me

In Gaga's commentary on the song [2], she offers some insight into the line "I'd rather be dry but at least I'm alive," equating the word dry to being sober and how tough times often result in the use of alcohol to "numb the pain."  I like the multiple layers and room for lyrical interpretation.

Overall, the lyrics are fine.  The verses are competent and the delivery in the other sections makes up for the overall sparse content and minimal approach (55ish repeats of "rain").

Common Threads

In this round, "on the 0's," I have compiled a list of common musical elements present in no.1 hits across decades.  Let's see how many boxes "Rain On Me" checks.

  • Repeated melodic motifs - Absolutely!  This song does a great job of borrowing melodic and rhythmic ideas from different sections and reusing them in a new way....just look at the outro!
  • Strong harmonic motion from V to I  - No V-I motion, but this is the third song in a row to bank on i - bVI - bVII as part of the primary progression.  In the wrap up, this point will have to be flushed out.     
  • Background singers contribute to melodic/harmonic texture - These two women are not singing backup for one another, but they certainly contribute to the texture throughout, especially in the combined spoken/melodic parts.  
  • Modulation -  
  • New material presented at the end 
  • Hook that uses the title of the song   
  • Contains a lyrical refrain  - Potentially, "rain" could be considered a refrain, as it appears in each post-chorus section.  

5/7 common elements are present in "Rain On Me."  It's not surprising.  This song is a stereotypical pop song, for better or worse.  It has that "no.1 song" sound, and after analyzing the music, it's clear as to what that might mean.  

Final Takeaways

This song is fine.  I like it.  I don't love it and will probably not go out of my way to listen to it, unsolicited.  That being said, it's very well done.  The vocal performances are excellent and the composition of the song is worthy of study (the bridge is compelling).

I don't really know much about Ariana Grande and this is her only song I could name.  I am a fan of Lady Gaga and like many of her other songs better than this one.  When I mentioned this song to my wife, she even commented that this is not "prime Gaga material."

What do you think of "Rain On Me?"  How do the artists' other songs stack up to this one?  Leave me a comment!

Next time.....couple of things in the hopper.  First, I have finished my song inspired by lessons learned in this project.  I plan to present that in the next entry.  

I am still officially awaiting the charts for August 8th to cement my "first week in August" plan for this round "on the 0's."  While waiting for that, I checked into all the no.1 hits, so far, in 2020.  I think I will slowly make my way through them, which will be an interesting set of data points on their own.  So much music to cover and I am looking forward to it!